Session 4 - Module A: Advanced Query Understanding¶
⚠️ ADVANCED OPTIONAL MODULE This is supplementary content for deeper specialization.
Prerequisites: Complete Session 4 core content first. Time Investment: 50 minutes Target Audience: Implementer path students and NLP specialists
Module Learning Outcomes¶
After completing this module, you will master: - Sophisticated query understanding and intent detection techniques - Multi-turn conversation context management for RAG systems - Advanced query expansion and refinement strategies - Semantic gap analysis and query-document alignment optimization
🧭 Navigation & Quick Start¶
Related Modules:
- Core Session: Session 4 - Query Enhancement & Context Augmentation
- Related Module: Session 3 Module A - Index Algorithms
🗂️ Code Files: All examples use files in src/session4/
comprehensive_enhancer.py
- Complete query processing pipelinesemantic_gap_analyzer.py
- Query intent detectionmulti_query_generator.py
- Query expansion techniquesdemo_query_enhancement.py
- Query understanding showcase
🚀 Quick Start: Run cd src/session4 && python demo_query_enhancement.py
to see advanced query understanding
Advanced Query Understanding Patterns¶
Pattern 1: Intent Classification and Query Routing¶
Let's start by establishing the foundation for sophisticated query understanding. Query understanding goes beyond simple keyword extraction to comprehend user intent, context, and the type of response needed. This involves defining query types and the data structures needed to capture comprehensive query analysis.
First, we define the fundamental intent categories that represent different types of information needs:
from typing import Dict, List, Any, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
from enum import Enum
import re
class QueryIntent(Enum):
FACTUAL = "factual"
PROCEDURAL = "procedural"
COMPARATIVE = "comparative"
ANALYTICAL = "analytical"
CREATIVE = "creative"
TROUBLESHOOTING = "troubleshooting"
DEFINITIONAL = "definitional"
These intent categories represent the fundamental types of information needs that users express. Understanding intent is crucial because different query types require different retrieval and processing strategies. For example, a factual query like "What is the capital of France?" needs direct information retrieval, while a procedural query like "How do I deploy a RAG system?" requires step-by-step instructions.
Next, we'll define the comprehensive analysis result structure:
@dataclass
class QueryAnalysis:
intent: QueryIntent
complexity_level: str
domain: str
entities: List[str]
temporal_references: List[str]
confidence: float
processing_strategy: str
This analysis structure captures multiple dimensions of query understanding: intent classification, complexity assessment, domain identification, entity extraction, temporal context, confidence scoring, and processing recommendations.
Now let's implement the main analyzer class that orchestrates comprehensive query understanding:
class AdvancedQueryAnalyzer:
"""Advanced query understanding with intent detection and routing."""
def __init__(self, llm_model):
self.llm_model = llm_model
self.intent_patterns = self._initialize_intent_patterns()
self.domain_classifiers = self._initialize_domain_classifiers()
The analyzer combines pattern-based recognition with LLM-powered analysis, providing both speed and sophistication in query understanding. This hybrid approach uses fast pattern matching for common query structures while leveraging LLM capabilities for complex or ambiguous queries that require deeper semantic understanding.
Let's implement the comprehensive analysis method that coordinates all aspects of query understanding:
def analyze_query_comprehensively(self, query: str) -> QueryAnalysis:
"""Perform comprehensive query analysis for optimal processing."""
# Intent classification
intent = self._classify_intent(query)
# Complexity assessment
complexity = self._assess_complexity(query)
# Domain detection
domain = self._detect_domain(query)
# Entity extraction
entities = self._extract_entities(query)
# Temporal reference detection
temporal_refs = self._detect_temporal_references(query)
This analysis pipeline systematically extracts different aspects of query understanding, building a comprehensive picture of the user's intent and information needs.
Next, we calculate confidence and recommend processing strategy:
# Confidence scoring
confidence = self._calculate_confidence(query, intent, domain)
# Processing strategy recommendation
strategy = self._recommend_processing_strategy(intent, complexity, domain)
return QueryAnalysis(
intent=intent,
complexity_level=complexity,
domain=domain,
entities=entities,
temporal_references=temporal_refs,
confidence=confidence,
processing_strategy=strategy
)
This multi-step analysis ensures that every aspect of the query is understood before retrieval begins, enabling optimal processing strategy selection.
Now let's examine the intent classification method that combines pattern matching with LLM analysis:
def _classify_intent(self, query: str) -> QueryIntent:
"""Classify query intent using pattern matching and ML."""
# Pattern-based classification
for intent, patterns in self.intent_patterns.items():
for pattern in patterns:
if re.search(pattern, query.lower()):
return intent
Pattern-based classification provides fast intent detection for common query structures and keywords. This approach uses regular expressions to identify linguistic patterns that strongly indicate specific intent types, enabling rapid classification without expensive LLM calls for straightforward queries.
For more complex queries, we fallback to LLM-powered analysis:
# Fallback to LLM classification
intent_prompt = f"""
Classify the intent of this query into one of these categories:
- factual: Seeking specific facts or information
- procedural: Asking how to do something
- comparative: Comparing options or alternatives
- analytical: Requiring analysis or interpretation
- creative: Open-ended or creative requests
- troubleshooting: Problem-solving or debugging
- definitional: Asking for definitions or explanations
Query: {query}
Return only the category name:
"""
The LLM prompt provides clear category definitions and examples for accurate intent classification. By explicitly defining each category and providing the query context, we guide the LLM to make consistent classification decisions that align with our processing capabilities.
Finally, we handle the LLM response with error handling:
try:
response = self.llm_model.predict(intent_prompt).strip().lower()
return QueryIntent(response)
except:
return QueryIntent.FACTUAL # Default fallback
Intent classification combines fast pattern matching for common query types with sophisticated LLM analysis for complex cases. This hybrid approach provides both speed and accuracy in understanding user intent.
Pattern 2: Context-Aware Query Enhancement¶
Conversational RAG systems need to understand queries in the context of ongoing conversations. This requires resolving references, maintaining conversation state, and incorporating user preferences:
class ContextAwareQueryEnhancer:
"""Enhance queries based on user context and conversation history."""
def __init__(self, llm_model):
self.llm_model = llm_model
self.conversation_history = {}
self.user_profiles = {}
The context-aware enhancer maintains conversation history and user profiles to provide personalized and contextually relevant query processing. This is essential for conversational RAG systems where users build upon previous interactions and expect the system to remember context from earlier in the session.
Let's implement the main enhancement method that coordinates context integration:
def enhance_with_context(self, query: str, user_id: str,
session_id: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Enhance query using conversation context and user profile."""
# Retrieve conversation context
context = self._get_conversation_context(user_id, session_id)
# Get user profile
profile = self._get_user_profile(user_id)
# Resolve pronouns and references
resolved_query = self._resolve_references(query, context)
# Add implicit context
enriched_query = self._add_implicit_context(resolved_query, profile, context)
The enhancement process systematically builds context by retrieving conversation history, user preferences, and resolving ambiguous references.
Finally, we generate query variants and compile the complete enhancement result:
# Generate query variants
variants = self._generate_contextual_variants(enriched_query, context)
return {
"original_query": query,
"resolved_query": resolved_query,
"enriched_query": enriched_query,
"variants": variants,
"context_used": context,
"profile_factors": profile
}
This enhancement pipeline transforms ambiguous queries into clear, contextually complete queries that can be processed more effectively by retrieval systems.
Now let's examine the reference resolution process that handles pronouns and implicit references:
def _resolve_references(self, query: str, context: Dict) -> str:
"""Resolve pronouns and references using conversation context."""
if not context.get("recent_entities"):
return query
reference_prompt = f"""
Given this conversation context and current query, resolve any pronouns or references:
Recent entities mentioned: {context.get("recent_entities", [])}
Previous topics: {context.get("recent_topics", [])}
Current query: {query}
Return the query with references resolved:
"""
The reference resolution prompt provides conversation context to help resolve ambiguous references.
We process the LLM response with error handling:
Pattern 3: Multi-Modal Query Processing¶
Reference resolution is critical for conversational RAG systems where users often refer to previous topics using pronouns like "it," "that," or "the previous approach." By maintaining conversation context, we can resolve these references to specific entities and concepts.
Pattern 3: Multi-Modal Query Processing¶
Modern RAG systems often need to process queries that reference images, documents, or other media types. This requires integrating vision models and document analysis capabilities:
class MultiModalQueryProcessor:
"""Process queries that may reference images, documents, or other media."""
def __init__(self, vision_model, llm_model):
self.vision_model = vision_model
self.llm_model = llm_model
The multi-modal processor combines vision models for image analysis with language models for text processing, enabling comprehensive understanding of complex queries. This capability is increasingly important as users interact with RAG systems through rich media interfaces that support images, documents, and other file types alongside text.
Let's implement the main processing method that handles various attachment types:
def process_multimodal_query(self, query: str, attachments: List[Dict]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Process query with image, document, or other attachments."""
processed_attachments = []
for attachment in attachments:
if attachment["type"] == "image":
description = self._analyze_image(attachment["data"])
processed_attachments.append({
"type": "image",
"description": description,
"original": attachment
})
elif attachment["type"] == "document":
summary = self._summarize_document(attachment["data"])
processed_attachments.append({
"type": "document",
"summary": summary,
"original": attachment
})
This processing loop extracts meaningful information from each attachment type using specialized models. For images, vision models generate descriptive text that can be integrated into text-based retrieval. For documents, summarization techniques extract key information while preserving important context.
Next, we integrate the attachment context with the original query:
# Enhance query with attachment context
enhanced_query = self._integrate_attachment_context(query, processed_attachments)
return {
"enhanced_query": enhanced_query,
"processed_attachments": processed_attachments,
"multimodal_strategy": self._determine_multimodal_strategy(query, attachments)
}
This processing pipeline extracts meaningful information from each attachment type and integrates it with the text query to create a comprehensive search context.
Now let's examine the image analysis and context integration methods:
def _analyze_image(self, image_data: bytes) -> str:
"""Analyze image content for query enhancement."""
# Implement vision model analysis
description = self.vision_model.describe_image(image_data)
return description
def _integrate_attachment_context(self, query: str, attachments: List[Dict]) -> str:
"""Integrate attachment descriptions into query."""
if not attachments:
return query
context_parts = []
for attachment in attachments:
if attachment["type"] == "image":
context_parts.append(f"Image content: {attachment['description']}")
elif attachment["type"] == "document":
context_parts.append(f"Document content: {attachment['summary']}")
The integration method builds contextual descriptions from each attachment type. Rather than treating attachments as separate entities, we weave their content into the query context to create a unified search target that leverages both textual and multi-modal information.
Finally, we combine the original query with the attachment context:
enhanced_query = f"{query}\n\nReferenced content:\n" + "\n".join(context_parts)
return enhanced_query
Multi-modal query processing enables RAG systems to handle rich user interactions that include visual content, documents, and other media types. By extracting descriptive information from these attachments and integrating it with the text query, the system can provide more comprehensive and relevant responses.
📝 Multiple Choice Test - Module A¶
Test your understanding of advanced query understanding:
Question 1: What is the primary benefit of intent classification in query processing?
A) Reduces processing time
B) Enables specialized processing strategies tailored to query types
C) Reduces memory usage
D) Simplifies implementation
Question 2: Why is context-aware query enhancement important?
A) It reduces computational costs
B) It resolves ambiguities and adds implicit context from conversation history
C) It speeds up retrieval
D) It reduces storage requirements
Question 3: How does multi-modal query processing improve RAG systems?
A) It reduces complexity
B) It enables processing of queries with images, documents, and other media types
C) It reduces memory usage
D) It simplifies deployment
Question 4: What is the value of reference resolution in conversational RAG?
A) It improves speed
B) It resolves pronouns and references using conversation context for clarity
C) It reduces costs
D) It simplifies architecture
Question 5: Why should query complexity assessment guide processing strategy?
A) It reduces infrastructure costs
B) It allows allocation of appropriate computational resources and techniques
C) It speeds up all queries
D) It reduces memory usage
🧭 Navigation¶
Previous: Session 4 - Query Enhancement & Context Augmentation
Related Modules:
- Core Session: Session 4 - Query Enhancement & Context Augmentation
- Related Module: Session 3 Module A - Index Algorithms
Next: Session 5 - RAG Evaluation & Quality Assessment